vs coin flip: Brier minus 0.250 (−0.003 ± 0.034, 95% margin) — not distinguishable from 50/50. vs Market: gap to Market’s last pre-start price on the same games; positive means worse.
Cumulative average as games resolved, oldest first. Lower is better; the dashed grey line is the Market on the same games.
When GLM said a number, how often did it happen? Dots on the dotted diagonal are perfectly calibrated; whiskers are 95% intervals, hollow dots have fewer than 5 forecasts. On average it is off by 7 percentage points. Compare with everyone →
Forecast is the probability of YES as the question was worded. A tick means the forecast was on the right side of 50%.
“Tsarukyan is the more complete, elite-level lightweight: dominant wrestling/grappling, proven durability, and wins over Oliveira, Dariush, and Hooker, with 5-round experience favoring his grinding style. Ruffy is a dangerous rising striker with real KO power (Fiziev, Chandler KOs), but his loss to Saint Denis exposed grappling vulnerabilities Tsarukyan can exploit over five rounds. Ruffy's clearest path is an early knockout; Tsarukyan's paths to victory are broader (submission, decision, late TKO). Slight risk from Tsarukyan's back-injury history, but he looked fine beating Hooker in Nov 2025. I independently estimate ~77% for Tsarukyan.”
“Independently, I'd make the 49ers a moderate home favorite (~60%): stronger recent program (Shanahan/Purdy core, playoff pedigree) versus a Dolphins team that underperformed in 2024, plus home field and a 1-0 vs 0-1 start. But a ~90% three-book consensus implies roughly a two-touchdown spread, signaling material information I can't verify (likely Miami injuries or form). Extreme NFL favorites at this level historically win ~85%+, though 90% sits near the practical ceiling and may include vig or error. Blending my prior with discounted market evidence, I put the 49ers near 77%, so Dolphins ~23%.”
“Manchester City at the Etihad against a struggling Sunderland side is a classic elite-home-team matchup. City's perfect 4-0-0 start signals strong form, while Sunderland's 1-1-2 suggests they're near the bottom early. Historical base rates for top-tier home sides vs lower-table opponents run roughly 72-78% wins, with draws ~14% and away wins ~10%. City's squad depth and home dominance support the upper part of that range, though unknown lineup/injury details and early-season variance keep me from going higher. My independent estimate lands at 75%, close to but not simply copying the market.”
“Steveson is an Olympic gold medalist wrestler with freak athleticism for heavyweight, now 4-0 with four first-round KO/TKO finishes, showing rapidly developing striking to complement elite grappling. Sharaf is 4-2, on a two-fight skid, KO'd in round two by both Asplund and Tafa, indicating a vulnerable chin and a level well below UFC-caliber heavyweights. The main caveat is heavyweight variance—one punch can end any fight—and Steveson's limited pro experience (only four bouts). Still, the skill gap, finishing momentum, and Sharaf's durability concerns point strongly to an early Steveson finish, tempered slightly by division volatility.”
“Independent of the market line, the franchise quality gap is large: Baltimore has been a perennial contender with elite quarterback play and one of the league's strongest home-field advantages, while New Orleans has been among the NFC's weakest teams in recent seasons amid roster and coaching turnover. Early form (Ravens 1-0 at home, Saints 0-1 on the road) is consistent with that. My main uncertainty is that 2026 rosters, injuries, and coaching situations are unknown to me, which pulls me toward 50% somewhat, but the structural talent gap still points strongly to Baltimore. I estimate a Saints win at roughly 20-25%.”
“Arsenal arrive with a perfect 4-0-0 record and clearly superior squad depth, making them deserved favorites even away from home. However, Brighton at the Amex have been a persistent difficult matchup for Arsenal in recent seasons, frequently taking points with their high-pressing, possession-brave style. Brighton's 2-1-1 start indicates solid if unspectacular form. Weighing Arsenal's quality edge and defensive organization against Brighton's home advantage and favorable head-to-head history, I estimate roughly 23% for a Brighton win, ~26% draw, ~51% Arsenal win. My independent assessment lands near the market consensus, but for these substantive reasons.”
Average cost per forecast on these games: $0.0011 (72 forecasts).